Anderson, R., Fisher, K., & Walker, J. (2021). Library consultations and a global pandemic: An analysis of consultation difficulty during COVID-19 across multiple factors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102273
Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., & , & Jordan, Z. (2024). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01
Bagheri, M., Shabani, A., & Abedi, M. R. (2014). Effect of information counseling on library anxiety and library behaviors among users of public libraries. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 19(4), 569–581.
Beckmann, J. F., Birney, D. P., & Goode, N. (2017). Beyond psychometrics: the difference between difficult problem solving and complex problem solving. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1739.
Belanger, J., Collins, K., Deutschler, A., Greer, R., Huling, N., Maxwell, C., Papadopoulou, E., Ray, L., & Roemer, R. C. (2016). University of Washington Libraries chat reference transcript assessment https://lib.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/assessment_projects_chat-reference-assessment-project-2014-2016-final-report.pdf.
Bradley, D., Oehrli, A., Rieh, S. Y., Hanley, E., & , & Matzke, B. S. (2020). Advancing the reference narrative: Assessing student learning in research consultations. Evidence based library and information practice, 15(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29634
Bravender, P., Lyon, C., & Molaro, A. (2011). Should chat reference be staffed by librarians? An assessment of chat reference at an academic library using LibStats. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 16(3), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2011.595255
Brown, D. M. (1985). Telephone reference questions: A characterization by subject, answer format, and level of complexity. RQ, 1, 290–303.
Bunge, C. A. (1990). Factors Related to Output Measures for Reference Services in Public Libraries: Data from Thirty-Six Libraries. Public Libraries, 29(1), 42–47.
Butler, K., & Byrd, J. (2016). Research consultation assessment: Perceptions of students and librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.10.011
Childers, T., Lopata, C., & Stafford, B. (1991). Measuring the difficulty of reference questions. RQ, 31(2), 237–243.
Dempsey, P. R. (2016). “Are you a computer?” Opening exchanges in virtual reference shape the potential for teaching. College & Research Libraries, 77(4), 455–468.
Dennison, R. F. (1999). Usage-based staffing of the reference desk: A statistical approach. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 158–165.
Estrada, S., Floren, M., Harding, J., & Wroblewski, M. (2021). What is your research question? A mixed methods evaluation of an academic statistical consulting center. Evaluation and Program Planning, 89, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102001
Faix, A., MacDonald, A., & Taxakis, B. (2014). Research consultation effectiveness for freshman and senior undergraduate students. Reference Services Review, 42(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-05-2013-0024
Fields, A. M. (2006). Ill‐structured problems and the reference consultation: The librarian's role in developing student expertise. Reference Services Review, 34(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320610701554
Firsová, N., Hinke, J., & Smutka, L. (2024). Complexity of reference consultations for undergraduate and graduate students in an academic library. Knowledge and Performance Management, 8(2), 76.
Frank, D. G., Raschke, G. K., Wood, J., & Yang, J. Z. (2001). Information consulting: The key to success in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(2), 90–96.
Gerlich, B. K., & Berard, G. L. (2007). Introducing the READ scale: Qualitative statistics for academic reference services. Georgia Library Quarterly, 43(4), 4.
Gerlich, B. K., & Berard, L. G. (2010). Testing The Viability Of The READ Scale (Reference Effort Assessment Data)®: Qualitative Statistics For Academic Reference Services.
Harrison, R., Jones, B., Gardner, P., & Lawton, R. (2021). Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed-or multi-method studies. BMC health services research, 21(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06122-y
Hauff, C., Kelly, D., & Azzopardi, L. (2010, October). A comparison of user and system query performance predictions. Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, 979–988. https://doi.org/10.1145/1871437.1871562
Hirsh, S. (2018). Information services today: An introduction (2ed ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Jastram, I., & Zawistoski, A. G. (2008). Personalizing the library via research consultations. The Desk and beyond: Next generation reference services, 14–24.
Johnston, L., & Kennedy, M. (2024). An Assessment of Research Consultation Practices. https://www.libraryassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Johnston-An-Assessment-Project-of-Research-Consultations.pdf.
Kani, J. (2017). Evernote in the research consultation: a feasibility study. Reference Services Review, 45(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-05-2016-0034
Katz, W. A. (2002). Introduction to reference work. McGraw-Hill.
Kayongo, J., & Van Jacob, E. (2011). Burning the midnight oil: Librarians, students, and late-night chat reference at the University of Notre Dame. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 16(3), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2011.597632
Kemp, J. H., Ellis, C. L., & Maloney, K. (2015). Standing by to help: Transforming online reference with a proactive chat system. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 764–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.018
Keshvari, M., & Amiri, S. (2025). Virtual Reference Services: The Evolution of Questions; Diversity of Answerers (A Scoping Review). Library and Information Sciences, 28(1), 37–61.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American society for information science, 42(5), 361–371. https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of documentation, 49(4), 339–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026918
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Students and the information search process: Zones of intervention for librarians. Advances in librarianship, 18, 57–72.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1996). The Concept of a Zone of Intervention for Identifying the Role of Intermediaries in the Information Search Process. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 33, 91–94.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1999). The role of experience in the information search process of an early career information worker: Perceptions of uncertainty, complexity, construction, and sources. Journal of the American society for information science, 50(5), 399–412.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2007). Reflections on the development of the model of the information search process (ISP): Excerpts from the Lazerow Lecture, University of Kentucky, April 2, 2007. Bulletin of the american society for information science and technology, 33(5), 32–37.
Lai, K. (2023). How well does ChatGPT handle reference inquiries? An analysis based on question types and question complexities. College & Research Libraries, 84(6), 974.
Maloney, K., & Kemp, J. H. (2015). Changes in Reference Question Complexity Following the Implementation of a Proactive Chat System: Implications for Practice. 2015(7), 16. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.7.959
Michell, G., & Dewdney, P. (1998). Mental Models Theory: Applications for Library and Information Science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39(4), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/40324303
Mizzaro, S., & Mothe, J. (2016). Why do you Think this Query is Difficult? A User Study on Human Query Prediction. 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval, 1073-1076. https://doi.org/10.1145/2911451.2914696,
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & , & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Oberg, K. J. (2011). An Investigation of Reference Question Difficulty over Time University of Norht Carolina https://doi.org/10.17615/j4pv-hw82].
Peck, T. P. (1975). Counseling skills applied to reference services. RQ, 233–235.
Pelánek, R., Effenberger, T., & & Čechák, J. (2020). Complexity and difficulty of items in learning systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(1), 232–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00252-4
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & , & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
Pomerantz, J., & McClure, C. R. (2004). Evaluation of a statewide collaborative chat‐based reference service: Approaches and directions. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 109–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450410112
Robinson, B. M. (1989). Reference services: a model of question handling. RQ, 61(1), 29–48, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25828432.
Rogers, E., & Carrier, H. S. (2017). A qualitative investigation of patrons’ experiences with academic library research consultations. Reference Services Review, 45(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/rsr-04-2016-0029
Ryan, S. M. (2008). Reference transactions analysis: The cost-effectiveness of staffing a traditional academic reference desk. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 389–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.06.002
Saint Clair, J. W., Aluri, R., & Pastine, M. (1977). Staffing the reference desk: Professionals or Nonprofessionals? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3(3), 149–153.
Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American society for information science, 39(3), 197–216.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes Harvard university press.
Warner, A., & Hurley, D. A. (2021). Does the READ scale work for chat? A review of the literature. Evidence based library and information practice, 16(3), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29947
Warner, D. G. (2001). A new classification for reference statistics. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51–55.
White, M. D., & Iivonen, M. (2002). Assessing level of difficulty in web search questions. The Library Quarterly, 72(2), 205–233.
Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 37(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0
Xun, G., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational technology research and development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836
