نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 مدیر / فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی، ساری ، مازندران
2 استاد/ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی , واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران
3 استادیار/دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران
4 دانشیار/ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Introduction:Reflecting on the change in the world of the world through power domination, along with understanding (the relation of power-knowledge), while pointing out the sensitivity and influence (power category) to knowledge creation, storage, exchange and transfer; (knowledge strategy) and knowledge infrastructure to reach the “macro-knowledge management”; it can be a reason for the possibility change The world of knowledge and consequently (the change in the world of libraries and information centers) in history; therefore, it must "manage the vast array of subjective knowledge" from the beginning (production of knowledge) to the end (distribution) It was not far from the mind. The purpose of this study is to recognize the “macro-knowledge management” of power
Methodology:This qualitative research approach and its methodology have been the underlying theory. Participants in the research included twenty faculty members in related topics of social sciences and information science and science. They were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data analysis was performed based on three coding methods used in grounded theory, including open source coding, axial coding and selective coding.
Findings: The results of this study showed that: The underlying theory emphasizes the likelihood of the existence of the exploitation of the world of knowledge of the world, which is shaped by its power and its impact on the processes of information management and knowledge management. Accordingly, the exploitation of the knowledge of the universe is indisputable in favor of the influence and power of the reality of reality, and this factor is a factor in the transformation of information and knowledge through the administration of knowledge.
Conclusion :A bi-directional management in different forms: Value management (Knowledge Management Affected by Science Classification); Cognitive Knowledge Management (Cognitive Knowledge Management); Exclusive Knowledge Management (Knowledge Management Influenced by Geopolitics of Information); Destructive Knowledge Management (Knowledge Management Affected by the Destruction of Information Resources); Infected Knowledge Management (Managing Knowledge Based on Information Pollution) can be applied.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله