Study the Status of Scientific Products in “Open Science”

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• Shima Moradi ¹
• Firoozeh Dokhani ²

¹ Assistant professor/National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP)

² Scientometric Researcher In the field of Altmetrics Studies

10.22067/infosci.2021.23982.0

Abstract

Introduction: Open science is one of the principals of the scientific community which includes any changes to the future of knowledge and dissemination. In order to provide a comprehensive scientific overview of the subject area of open science in the world, the present study aims at mapping the process of historical and thematic trends of this subject, the intellectual structure derived from the analysis of co-citation, and co-occurrence network analyses as well as the social structure of co-authorship.
Methodology: The research is an applied type with using scientometrics and a quantitative approach which had investigated the status of scientific products of open science index in Scopus from the beginning until the end of 2019. For visualizing data, VOSviewer and Gephi were used.
Findings: The US and UK were the most influential countries amongst others, while no records of Iran was indexed in this subject. In addition, there was a great variety of subject areas in open science; while, both computer and social sciences were indexed the most papers with this subject.
Conclusion: This subject was multidisciplinary and in terms of historical trends, the growth of research in open science has increased over the years. Co-authorship network demonstrated that authors with a stronger co-authorship network were among the most prolific authors in the field, too.

Keywords

• Open Science
• Scientific output
• Visualization
• Scientometrics

---

References

ابراهیمی، قربانعلی (1372). اجتماع علمی و ساختارهای آن. رهیافت, 3(5), 30-40. بازیابی شده در 23 اسفند 1399 از:  http://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13077.html     

حاضری، افسانه ، مکی‌زاده،، فاطمه ، بیک‌خورمیزی، فرزانه (1395). تحلیل هم واژگانی مقالات مستخرج از پایان نامه های کارشناسی ارشد علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی. نشریه پژوهشنامه علم‌سنجی, 2(4), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2016.492    

حسن‌زاده، پریسا، اسفندیاری‌مقدم، علیرضا، سهیلی، فرامرز، موسوی‌چلک، افشین (1396). پژوهش‌های جهانی «نارسایی مزمن قلب». مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گیلان, 26(103), 72-82. بازیابی شده در 23 اسفند 1399 از: https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=310729

دبیرخانه‌شورای‌عالی‌عتف (1386). سیاست‌ها و الویت‌های پژوهش و فناوری کشور (در بازه زمانی 1396 تا 1400). شورای عالی عتف. بازیابی شده در 3 دی 1396 از: https://www.atf.gov.ir/Content/media/filepool3/2019/7/245.pdf?t=636988871642436250   

زره‌ساز، محمد (1390). ارتباطات علمی به منزله یک نظام اطلاعاتی: جنبش دسترسی آزاد و تغییرات پارادایمی. شمسه: نشریهالکترونیکی سازمان کتابخانه ها، موزه ها و مرکز اسناد آستان قدس رضوی, 3(12131390), 1-17. بازیابی شده در 23 اسفند 1399 از:

   http://shamseh.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_50369.html

عصاره، فریده،  بابائی، کبری (1393). شبکۀ هم نویسندگی مقالات منتشرشده در فصلنامه روانشناسی افراد استثنایی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی و فصلنامه کودکان استثنایی پژوهشکده استثنایی. فصلنامه مطالعات دانش شناسی, 1(1), 1-17. بازیابی شده در 23 اسفند 1399 از: https://jks.atu.ac.ir/article_244.html  

علی‌نژاد‌چمازکی، فاطمه، میرحق‌جولنگرودی، سعیده (1397). مصورسازی شبکه همکاری علمی پژوهشگران فصلنامه مدیریت سلامت با رویکرد علم‌سنجی: 1392 تا 1396. مدیریت سلامت, 21(74), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.29252/jha.21.74.35  

مجمع‌تشخیص‌مصلحت‌نظام (1383‌الف). سیاست کلی نظام برای رشد و توسعه علمی تحقیقاتی کشور در بخش آموزش عالی و مراکز تحقیقاتی (مصوب 05/12/1383). بازیابی شده در 3 دی 1396 از: http://1404.ir/download?f=2015/05/10/0/207.pdf

مجمع‌تشخیص‌مصلحت‌نظام (1383‌ب). سیاست کلی نظام برای رشد و توسعه فناوری (مصوب 22/01/1383). بازیابی شده در بازیابی شده در 3 دی 1396 از: http://maslahat.ir/DocLib2/Approved%20Policies/Offered%20General%20Policies.aspx     

 

Alperin, Juan Paolo, Morales, Esteban, & McKiernan, Erin (2019). Academic review promotion and tnure documents promote a view of open access that is at odds with the wider academic community. LSE Impact Blog. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/07/17/academic-review-promotion-and-tenure-documents-promote-a-view-of-open-access-that-is-at-odds-with-the-wider-academic-community/            

Chedd, Graham (1973). Science and Society: Open Science. New Scientist, 58(848), 570. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/765555

Chigwada, Josilin (2020). Open Science and Its Impact on Libraries, Publishers, and Authors. In Handbook of Research on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Library and Information Science (pp. 97-108). IGI Global. from https://www.igi-global.com/book/handbook-research-emerging-trends-technologies/223984

Cook, Bryan, Lloyd, John, Mellor, David, Nosek, Birian, & Therrien, William (2018). Promoting open science to increase the trustworthiness of evidence in special education. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 104-118. from https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0014402918793138             

Cronin, Blaise  (2003). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. Keynote address. Scholarly tribes and tribulations: How tradition and technology are driving disciplinary change. ARL. Washington, DC. . Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from https://arl.nonprofitsoapbox.com/storage/documents/publications/scholarly-tribes-cronin-17oct03.pdf             

David, Paul (2004). Understanding the emergence of ‘open science’institutions: functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and corporate change, 13(4), 571-589. from https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth023  

EuropeanCommission. (2016). Open innovation, Open Science, open to the world. A vision for Europe. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from  https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3213b335-1cbc-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1

Fecher, Benedikt, & Friesike, Sascha  (2014). Open science: one term, five schools of thought. Opening science, 17-47. Springer, Cham. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from

https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/28008/1001989.pdf?sequence=1#page=24

Frandsen, Tove faber (2009). The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields. Information Processing & Management, 45(1), 131-141. from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.001       

Galaxy. (2018). Galaxy Project. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/2133

House, White (2013). Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research. The white house. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf

Karmanovskiy, Nikolay, Mouromtsev, Dmitry, Navrotskiy, Mikhail, Pavlov, Dmitry, & Radchenko, Irina (2016). A case study of open science concept: linked open data in university. International Conference on Digital Transformation and Global Society, from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_39    

Kraker, Peter, Leony, David, Reinhardt, Wolfgang, & Beham, Guter (2011). The case for an open science in technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(6), 643-654. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/773d/c03085f19a5b861d0efcda5baabf25ed869a.pdf

Kunst, Sabine, & Degkwitz, Andearas (2019). Open Science-the new paradigm for research and education? Information Services and Use, 38(4), 203-205. from https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-180014          

Levin, Nadine, Leonelli, Sabira, Weckowska, Dagmara, Castle, David, & Dupré, John (2016). How do scientists define openness? Exploring the relationship between open science policies and research practice. Bulletin of science, technology & society, 36(2), 128-141. from https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616668760             

Masuzzo, Paolo, & Martens, Lenart (2017). Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language (2167-9843). from https://peerj.com/preprints/2689.pdf

McKiernan, Erin, Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, Birian, Ram, K., & Soderberg, C. K. (2016). Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed. elife, 5, e16800. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from https://elifesciences.org/articles/16800              

Nosek, Brian, Alter, George, Banks, George, Borsboom, Denny, Bowman, Sara, Breckler, Steven, Buck, Stuart, Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., & Christensen, G. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422-1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374           a

NSF. (2016). Dissemination and sharing of research results — NSF—National Science Foundation. NSF. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp

Perry, Laura (2018). Assessing the performance of educational research in Australian universities: an alternative perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 343-358. Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1355893           

Smith, Kendal , & Makel, Matthew (2019). Open Science: A Candid Conversation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1177/1932202X19829750  

Tacke, Oliver (2010). Open Science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and Web 2.0. In On collective intelligence (pp. 37-48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14481-3_4

Vasilevsky, N. A., Minnier, J., Haendel, M. A., & Champieux, R. E. (2017). Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? PeerJ, 5, e3208. Accessed Sept. 11, 2019 from  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3208

Vicente-Sáez, Ruben, & Martínez-Fuentes, Clara (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of business research, 88, 428-436. from https://doi.org/Doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043              

Woelfle, Micheal, Olliaro, Pierro, & Todd, Matthew (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature chemistry, 3(10), 745-748. . Accessed Mar. 15, 2021 from  https://www.nature.com/articles/nchem.1149