The Future of Subject Headings: Pre- vs. Post-Coordination

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

• Mahdi Khademian
• Mortaza Kokabi

Shahid Chamran University

10.22067/riis.v4i1.18996

Abstract

Purpose: After the advent and development computer technology, Pre- vs. Post-Coordination has been considered as an important issue in information storage and retrieval. From the 1950's to present, pros and cons comparison of keyword system and controlled vocabulary is concerned.
Methodology: With the review of related literature, a key question about the future of subject headings in the Third Millennium was concerned and appropriate strategies were proposed.
Findings: Subject headings as a pre-coordinated system provide context, suggestibility, browsability and precision, capabilities which do not exist in post-coordinated system. Thus it can play a critical role in information organization in the Third Millennium. However, the list of subject headings has disadvantages, such as complexity of subject assignment rules, the cost of pre-coordination, and difficulty in understanding of subject strings by users, issues that should be resolved. Appropriate strategies for the future of subject headings are: more automation for subject assignment with smart technology, simplifying subject assignment rules, and developing a new search engine with new display abilities, such as ontology and information visualization.

Keywords

• Subject Headings
• Pre-coordination
• Post-coordination
• Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH)
• Keyword systems
• Controlled vocabulary systems

---

References

Anderson, J. D. ; Hofmann, M. A. (2006). A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1): 7-38.

Bodoff, D. and Kambil, A. (1997). Pre-Coordination + Post-Coordination=Partial Coordination. Information Systems Working Papers Series. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1284809 (2012/05/23)

Calhoun, K. (2006). The Changing Nature of the Catalog and Its Integration with Other Discovery Tools. Final Report. Prepared for the Library of Congress: A Critical Review. http://guild2910.org/AFSCMECalhounReviewREV.pdf (2012/07/25)

Chan, L.. (2006). Thoughts on LCSH. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/pre_vs_post.pdf (2012/05/12)

Cochrane, P. A. (1984). Modern Subject Access in the Computer Age. American Libraries 15, 250-52.

Cochrane, P. A. (1986). Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs. Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.

Dean, R. J. (2004) FAST: Development of Simplified Headings for Metadata. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39(1/2): 331-352.

Drabenstott, K. M. ; Vizine-Goetz, D. (1994). Using Subject Headings for Online Retrieval: Theory, Practice, and Potential. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Pr. pp. 113-20.

Drabenstott, K. M., Simcox, Schelle, and Williams, Marie (1999). Do Librarians Understand the Subject Headings in Library Catalogs? Reference & User Services Quarterly. 38(4): 369-87.

Fischer, K. S. (2005). Critical views of LCSH, 1990-2001: the third bibliographic essay, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 41(1): 63-109.

Horri, Abbas (1994). Some issues and problems on pre-coordinate storage and post-coordinate retrieval in computerized systems. Faslname-Ye Ketab, 19,20(3,4):8.

Joudrey, D. N. ; Taylor, A. G. (2006). RE: LCSH Strings – some thoughts. Email to Barbara B. Tillett.

Khasseh, Ali Akbar (2006). FAST Faceted subject headings: a main step towards achieving the goals of metadata schemes. Library and Information Science, 9(1):125-142.

Kirtland, M. ; Cochrane, P. A. (1982). Critical views of LCSH-Library of Congress Subject Headings: a bibliographic and bibliometric essay, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 1(2/3): 71-94.

Library of Congress Subject Headings Pre- vs. Post-Coordination and Related Issues. Prepared by the Cataloging Policy and Support Office March 15, 2007. (2012/05/12) http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/pre_vs_post.pdf

O`Neil, E. T. (2005). FAST [power point presentation].In Cataloging Seminar, Sidney. (2012/07/11) http://nal.gov.au/lis/stndrds/grps/acoc/fast.pdf

Ritchie, K. and Alicea, R. (2006). LC Staff Survey on Subject Cataloging Report. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/pre_vs_post.pdf(2012/06/16)

Sanatjoo, Aazam ; Fathian, Akram (2011). The comparison of thesaurus and ontology efficiency in knowledge representation. Library and Information Science Research, 1(1):219-240.

Shubert, S. Blake (1992). Critical views of LCSH-ten years later: a bibliographic essay, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 15(2): 37.

Svenonius, Elaine (1993). Pre-coordination or not? Translated by Ali Mazinani. Faslname-Ye Ketab, 16(4):53.

The Policy and Standards Division’s Progress on the Recommendations made in “Library of Congress Subject Headings Pre- vs. Post-Coordination and Related Issues” Prepared by the Policy and Standards Division submitted January 13, 2010, revised Feb. 18, 2010. (2012/07/23) http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/pre_vs_postupdate.pdf