An Analysis of the Pragmatist Approach to the Concept of Relevance in Information Retrieval

Document Type : مقالات مروری

Authors

• Mohsen Nowkarizi ¹
• Mahdi Zeynali Tazeh Kandi ²
• Hassan Behzadi ³

¹ Professor/ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² ِDoctoral candidate/Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

³ َAsosiate Professor\Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

10.22067/infosci.2021.23409.0

Abstract

Intruduction: The aim is to briefly describe the pragmatist philosophy and to explore and analyze the pragmatist approach to the concept of relevance in information retrieval.
Methodology: The article is a conceptual analysis that uses the Theory of Activity and literature review to explain what is happening in practice so that a person in need of information can solve his or her information needs. The theory of Activity is a comprehensive theory, by which the pragmatist approach of relevance concept is explained.
Findings: The system-oriented approach and the user-oriented approach have their origins respectively in the positivism and the hermeneutics. Only the studies on the evaluation of information retrieval (relevance) will be successful which have benefited both from the system-oriented approach and user-oriented one in studies in which all aspects of the relevance concept are considered. Pragmatists argued that a false dichotomy exists between two quantitative and qualitative approaches, and one may combine the two approaches so that the combination focuses on action. According to the pragmatic school, a document which is used is relevant. On the one hand, A can be considered relevant to task 1, only if A can help a person to achieve his/her goal and answer his/her information needs. On the other hand, that document in terms of its facial and intrinsic features should be in accordance with the need of the person who needs information, accepted by the culture of the intended community and accessible for the individual who needs information. In other words, a document that actually meets information needs is actually relevant.
Conclusion: Relevance is a complex concept and various factors affect its final outcome. Hence, in spite of numerous studies on the concept of relevance, further research is needed on this subject. Finally, one can say that thinking of the philosophy of science is necessary to understand the concept of relevance according to whether the purpose of science is to describe what is actually happening and is easily visible to us, or science should explain what is not readily apparent, and to determine it.

Keywords

• Relevance
• Pragmatism
• Information retrieval
• Information seeking
• Theory of activity theory

---

References

 

علی احمدی، علیرضا؛ و غفاریان، وفا (1382). اصول شناخت و روش تحقیق. فصلنامه علوم انسانی دانشگاه الزهرا، 13(46)، 241-266.

محدث اردبیلی، علی (1355). مسائل مهم روانشناسی اجتماعی. تبریز: انتشارات دانشگاه آذر آبادگان.

اسدی، مریم (1389). نظریه فعالیت: چارچوبی برای مطالعه رفتار اطلاعاتی. فصلنامه اطلاع‌شناسی، 8(3)، 103-122.

خاتمی، محمود (1381). پراگماتیسم و اومانیسم. فلسفه، 4(5)، 97 - 112.

داورپناه، محمدرضا (1386). ارتباط علمی: نیاز اطلاعات و رفتار اطلاع‌یابی. تهران: دبیزش.

مبینی‌دهکردی، علی (1390). معرفی طرح‌ها و مدل‌ها در روش تحقیق آمیخته. فصلنامه راهبرد، 20(60)،217-234.

فتاحی، رحمت‌الله (1383). تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر نسبی بودن ربط در نظام‌های بازیابی اطلاعات. اطلاع‌شناسی، 2(1)، 2-7.

سلیمی فر، ژاله؛ و جمالی مهمویی، حمیدرضا (1395). مروری بر تأثیر فرهنگ به عنوان یک عامل بافتی بر رفتار اطلاعاتی. پژوهش‌نامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 6(2)، 41-60.

قبادپور، وفا؛ فدائی، غلامرضا؛ و ثابت پور، افسون (1393). ربط عینی و ربط ذهنی در نظام‌های اطلاعاتی: تحلیلی بر ربط در بازیابی اطلاعات. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 30(1)، 246-268.

قهرمانی، محمدامین؛ و عبدالهی، بیژن (1392). بنیان‌های فلسفی و بررسی ارتباط بین هستی‌شناسی و معرفت‌شناسی پارادایم‌های تفسیری، انتقادی و علمی با روش‌شناسی و روش‌های مورد استفاده در این پارادایم‌ها. مجله پژوهش، 4(1)، 52-69.

کیانی، محمدرضا (1391). رویکردهای ارزیابی نظام‌های بازیابی اطلاعات: پس‌زمینه و چشم‌انداز روبه‌رو. کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 15(2)، 243-258.

محسنی، حمید (1387). مجموعه‌سازی و خدمات تحویل مدرک. تهران: کتابدار.

نوکاریزی، محسن؛ و داورپناه، محمدرضا (1385). تحلیلی بر الگوهای رفتار اطلاع‌یابی. کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 9(2)، 119-152.

 

Allen, D., Karanasios, S., & Slavova, M. (2011). Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 776-788.

Bookstein, A. (1979). Relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(5), 269-273.

Borlund, P. (2003). The concept of relevance in IR. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 913-925.

Boyce, B. R., Boyce, B. R., Meadow, C. T., Kraft, D. H., Kraft, D. H., & Meadow, C. T. (2017). Text information retrieval systems: Elsevier.

Budd, J. M. (2004). Relevance: Language, semantics, philosophy. Library Trends, 52(3), 447-462.

Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Uk: Emerald.

Crawford, K., & Hasan, H. M. (2006). Demonstrations of the Activity Theory framework for Research in IS. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 13(2), 49-68.

Engeström, Y. (2006). Activity theory and expansive design. Theories and practice of interaction design, 3-23.

Fidel, R. (2008). Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science. Library & information science research, 30(4), 265-272.

Fitzgerald, M. A., & Galloway, C. (2001). Relevance judging, evaluation, and decision making in virtual libraries: A descriptive study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 989-1010.

Hasan, H., & Kazlauskas, A. (2014). Activity theory: Who is doing what, why and how. In H. Hassan (Ed.), Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research (pp. 9-14). Wollongong, Australia: THEORI.

Hjørland, B. (2010). The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 217-237.

Huang, X., & Soergel, D. (2013). Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 18-35.

Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information retrieval interaction (Vol. 246): Taylor Graham London.

James, W., & Blau, J. L. (1963). Pragmatism and Other Essays. USA: Washington Square Press,.

Järvelin, K. (2007). An analysis of two approaches in information retrieval: From frameworks to study designs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 971-986.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 112-133.

Kaptelinin, V. (2021). Activity Theory In The encyclopedia of human computer interaction.

Kumar, B., & Pavithra, S. (2010). Evaluating the searching capabilities of search engines and metasearch engines: a comparative study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57(2), 87-97.

Lucas, W., & Topi, H. (2002). Form and function: The impact of query term and operator usage on Web search results. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 95-108.

Mizzaro, S. (1998). How many relevances in information retrieval? Interacting with computers, 10(3), 303-320.

Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction: mit Press.

Saracevic, T. (1995). Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.

Saracevic, T. (2007). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: Nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 1915-1933.

Saracevic, T. (2012). Research on relevance in information science: A historical perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASIS&T 2012 Pre-Conference on the History of ASIS&T and Information Science and Technology.

Scheffler, I. (2013). Four pragmatists: A critical introduction to Peirce, James, Mead, and Dewey. New York: Routledge.

Swanson, D. R. (1986). Subjective versus objective relevance in bibliographic retrieval systems. The Library Quarterly, 56(4), 389-398.

Vickery, A., & Vickery, B. C. (2005). Information science in theory and practice. Germany: Walter de Gruyter.

Wartofsky, M. W. (2012). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding (Vol. 48): Springer Science & Business Media.

West, C. L. (2011). Teaching Middle School Jazz: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.

Wilson, T. D. (2008). Activity theory and information seeking. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 119-161.