Use and Relevance Judgment of elements (Title, Abstract, Keywords and fulltext) in document selection and evaluation: An approach based on Riding’s cognitive style analysis

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• mahdieh mirzabeigi ¹
• azam sanatjoo ²
• mohammad hodein dayani ³

¹ Ph.D. student of librarianship and information, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Assistant Professor of Library and Information Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

³ Professor of Library and Information Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

10.22067/riis.v2i2.14018

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of cognitive style on document relevance judgment in document selection and evaluation process.

Method: This is an applied research conducted through a survey method. Humanities & social Science – Pure and engineering science Students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, were selected as samples for Riding’s cognitive style analysis in order to distinguish two cognitive style groups (Holistic and Analytic).
Findings: The results of the research demonstrated that there were significant differences between the two cognitive style's grading of relevance judgment across the six simulated work tasks. Furthermore, although there was no significant difference between Humanities & social Science – Basic & engineering science samples in using document elements, Holistic mostly used fulltext, while analytic ones used titles and abstracts intheir relevance judgment. It is expected that the results of the study can help search engine and web designers enhance a user-personalized interface in order to support interactive information retrieval systems.

Keywords

• Analytic
• Holistic
• Document elements
• Document evaluation
• Relevance judgment

---

References

 

     Chen ,S.Y. and Ford, .(1998). Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia based learning system: an individual differences approach.Knowledge organization,25(3),67-78

Cosijn, E. & P.Ingwersen(2000). Dimensions of Relevance. Information Processing and Management. 36:533-550

Ford, N. Wilson, T., Foster, A., Ellis, D.& Spink, A. (2002). Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 4. Cognitive styles in information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 53: 134–144.

Graff, M. (2005) Individual differences in hypertext browsing strategies. Behaviour and InformationTechnology.24(2): 93-99.

Kuhthau,C(1991). Inside the search Process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.42(5):361-371.

Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR theory.  Journal of Documentation. 52(1): 3–50.

Janes, J. W. (1991) . Relevance judgments and the incremental presentation of document representations. Information Processing & Management, 27, 629–646.

Kim, K.S. (1997). Effects of cognitive and problem-solving styles on information-seeking behavior in the WWW: A case study. Retrieved January  25, 2012, from http://www.edb.utexas.edu/mmresearch/Students07/Kim

Kim, S (1998).Information-Seeking behavior on the World Wide Web: effects of cognitive style, Online Database search experience and task type on search performance. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation .university of Texas.

Kim, K. & Palmquist, R.A. (2000). Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(6): 558–566

Ford, N., & S.Y. Chen (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: An empirical study.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 9(4): 281–312.

Kim, S. K. & B.Allen(2002). Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53 (2):109-119.

Kinley, Khamsum and Dian Tjondronegoro(2010). User- Web Interactions: how wholistic/ Analytic web users search the web.OZCHI2010 Proceedings

Marchionini, G(1998).Design of interfaces for information seeking. . Annual Review for Information Science and Technology.33: 89-130.

Martinez , Enrique Frias (2008).Investigation of Behavior and Perception of Digital Library Users: A Cognitive Style Perspective.  

International Journal of Information Management . 28(5).

Riding, R. J., & I. Cheema (1991). Cognitive styles . an overview and integration. Educational Psychology. 11:193-215.

Saracevic, T.(1969).Comparative effects of titles, abstractd and full texts on relevance judgements.Processings of the American Society for Information Science,Washington,D.C.,(pp.293-299).

Saracevic, T.(1975). Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26: 321–343.

Saracevic, Tefko.(2007) "Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information Science. Part II. Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Wang, P., Hawk, W.B., & C.Tenopir (2000). Users’ interaction with World Wide Web resources: An exploratory study using a holistic approach. Information Processing & Management. 36:229–251.