Barriers to the use of web2.0 technologies in Iran university libraries

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• vahed bahrami ¹
• azam sanatjoo ²

¹ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Copenhagen University

10.22067/riis.v4i2.17361

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the main barriers to use Web2.0 technologies in academic libraries of Iran.
Methodology: A descriptive and analytical survey method was used. The population of this research was the librarians' academic libraries. For collecting data a researcher- developed questionnaire were used.
Findings: Results showed that librarians have little familiarity with web technologies 2. According to the results, most of their familiarity is related to the blog and the lowest level of familiarity is related to social cataloging. Librarians use wiki tool than other tools. Lowest use of these technologies, are tagging and social bookmarking. The results also showed that all three factors, have effects on the use of Web 2 technologies in academic libraries, but the most effective factor is related to the users and the least effective factor is related to factors associated with the librarians. From the librarian's point of view, use of web 2.0 technologies is necessary and greatest necessity is RSS, averaging 1. 95. Some suggestions are given by the researcher in order to remove barriers to the use of web technologies in university libraries.

Keywords

• Information Technology
• Web2.0
• Librarian2.0
• barriers
• Academic libraries
• Librarians

---

References

Dayani, M. (2008). Strategies of research in social science. Mashhad: electronic library publication: 84-93. (In Persian)

Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A and hoseini-shoar, M(2011). "familiarity and use of web 2.0 tools among librarians working in Hamedan academic libraries". The Journal of Library and Information Science. 53(1). (In Persian)

Moradi, Sh; alipoor, O; Saberi, M and Falahati, A (2011). Web 2 applications in Middle Eastern Academic libraries. The Journal of Library and Information Science. 54(2).

Noroozi, A. (2008) Library 2.0: library services based web2.0. Generalities Monthly; 131(8): 24-35: http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/494996. (In Persian)

Sarmad, Z; bazergan, A; hejazi, E. research method in Behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah publication; 2010: 89-111. (In Persian)

Tajeddini, O; sadat moosavi, A. web2.0: Contrast fact and ideal. Generalities Monthly; 2008; 131(8): 18-23. (In Persian)

Zarrati, M. familiarity with web2.0 technologies. Science communication; 2007;12(1): 61-66: http://rayasamin1.irandoc.ac.ir/ejournal?IssueId=321. (In Persian)

Abdul Aziz,Rafidah; Arif,Zuraidah; Ramly , Ruzita; Hj Abdullah,Che Zainab, and Haslinda Husaini (2011). The implications of Library 2.0 tools in Malaysian Academic Libraries towards Reference Services. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education and Practice : issues, challenges and opportunities, 22-24 June 2011, Pullman Putrajaya Lakeside, Malaysia.

Aharony,N (2009). The influence of LIS students’ personality characteristics on their perceptions towards Web 2.0 use. Librarianship and Information Science, 41 (4), 227–242.

Bolan, K., Meg, C. and Ro, C.)2007(. Web, Library, and Teen Services 2.0. Young Adult Library Services,18(4), 40-44.

Burhanna,Kenneth J; Jamie Seeholzer and Joseph Salem Jr )2009(. No Natives Here: A Focus Group Study of Student Perceptions of Web 2.0 and the Academic Library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(6), 523–532.

Chen Xu, Fenfei Ouyang and Heting Chu) 2009(.The Academic library meets web2.0. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,35(4), 324–331.

Chua, A.Y.K. and Goh, D. H. (2010(. A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites.Library & Information Science Research, 32: 203–211.

Cuong Linh, N. )2008(. A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries, Library Hi Tech, 26 (4): 630 – 653.

Davis, Peltier, C.)2009(. Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Library User 2.0, Librarian 2.0: Innovative Services for Sustainable Libraries.Computers in Libraries, 29(10): 16-21.

Frumkin, J. (2005) . The Wiki and the digital library. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital LibraryPerspectives. 21 (1), 18-22.

Han, Z. and Yan‌‌Quan, L.)2010(.Web 2.0 applications in top Chinese university libraries.Library Hi Tech, 28 (1): 41–62.

Harinarayana, N.S. and Raju, N. V (2010). Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. The Electronic Library. 28 (1), 69-88.

Kim,Y.M. and Abbas, J (2010). Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective, School of Library and Information Studies.36 (3:( 211-218.

Mansor, Yushiana; Idris, Sufy (2010). Perceptions, awareness and acceptance of library 2.0 applications among librarians at the International Islamic University Malaysia. Webology, 7(2).

Needleman, M.(2007). Web 2.0/Lib 2.0–What is it? (If it’s anything at all). Serials Review, 33 (3): 202-203.

O'Reilly, T.(2007). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. International Journal of Digital Economics, 65:17-37.

Rethlefsen, Melissa L., Engard, Nicole C., Chang, Daphne, & aytko, Carol (2006). Social software for libraries and librarians. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 6( 4): 29-45-.

Tripathi M & Kumar S (2010). Use of Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: A reconnaissance of the international landscape. The International Information & Library Review, (42), 195-207.

Virkus, S (2008). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in LIS education: Experiences at Tallin University, Estonia. Electronic Library & Information Systems, 42 (3): 262- 274.