Proposing a conceptual framework for ''aesthetics of one website'' using metasynthesis and Shannon entropy methods based on Leibniz theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor,Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Khwarazmi University,, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, National Library and Archives of Iran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The user experience is at a higher level than the user interface. Nielsen's checklist recommended in 1994, consists of ten factors, one of which is aesthetics, but the dimensions of beauty in the web environment, after thirty years, remain unknown and have not been accurately interpreted. The present study was designed in order to reduce the mentioned ambiguity. The current research aims to identify the aesthetic components of "one website" based on Leibniz's theory and rank them based on the importance of the criteria. Proposing a conceptual framework for the ''aesthetics of one website'', is done.

Methodology: In this study, the systematic review method of meta-synthesis with Shannon's qualitative content analysis approach was used. A targeting keyword search was conducted in six databases: Google Scholar, Emerald, Web of Science, IRANDOC, ISC, and SID. The numbers of 1110 sources were retrieved. Then, the numbers of 64 documents were selected for meta synthesis study, according to the PRISMA statement. Leibniz's theory of aesthetics and two studies, aesthetic factors from Lavie and Tractinsky (2004) and website analysis from Guo and Hall (2009) used as the basis of qualitative coding. Then, for each aesthetic code identified, the importance coefficient was calculated based on Shannon's qualitative content analysis method introduced by Azar (2000). The mentioned method looks at each code in the sources as an exchanged message, and the resources are the interviewees or experts who answered the research question.

Findings: The number of 2 categories 4 concepts and 75 aesthetic codes were obtained by performing meta synthesis. Two general levels of "objective aesthetics" and "subjective aesthetics" were obtained as the main categories of website beauty. The subjective level is related to the user and his perception (subject) and the objective level is related to the website design (object). Two main concepts were obtained for each category including "semantic aesthetics" and "classical aesthetics". The coefficient of importance for the codes of "typography" and "order" in the concept of classical aesthetics and the category of objective aesthetics were ranked first and second. In the category of subjective aesthetics, based on priority, the codes of "having an attractive color combination", "easy navigation" and "moderate visual complexity " in the concept of classical aesthetics, were obtained at the top of importance. The numbers of forty-three aesthetic codes for a website were identified with an importance coefficient greater than zero. A conceptual framework based on Leibniz, proposing for ''aesthetics of one website''. A number of 43 codes with an importance coefficient greater than zero were identified, which were ranked from 1 to 16. The other 32 codes (out of a total of 75 identified codes) that had a zero Shannon entropy significance coefficient (the number of 1 repetition in previous studies) were placed in the 17th rank of Shannon's significance. The top 12 codes, in order of priority, were "observance of typography techniques in website content design", "orderliness and cleanliness of website content", "observance of symmetry in website content design", "non-visual complexity", "attractive website color combination" From the point of view of the web user's mind", "Unity in website content design", "Easy navigation in website content from the standpoint of the web user's mind", "Observance of the organization through order and sequence and compliance with hierarchy during website design", "Complexity in Average limit (not too little and not too much) from the website user's

standpoint", "Arousing the feeling of richness and variety from the website user's standpoint", "Website design with the approach of having a variety website content ", "Attractive and interesting And the non-boringness of the website from the standpoint of the web user". Adherence to the Gestalt principle, and adherence to the golden ratio in website design, are among the other identified codes.

Conclusion: It is appropriate for website administrators to pay attention to both the objective and subjective aspects of aesthetics to promote users. Several types of research have been conducted on the aesthetic factors of a website. But research such as the current one, which combines previous studies with a meta-synthesis approach and coding by Shannon’s entropy, is the first in Iran and also at the international level. In this field, interdisciplinary cooperation in the fields of computer sciences and social sciences is recommended.

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Abedi Ardakani, F. (2009). Features of the user interface in children's Persian websites from the perspective of primary school students in Yazd City. (Master), Qom, Iran. Retrieved from https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/c732ae6fcfe02b8a82f4d3b11c6f483f [In Persian]
Affandy, H. B., Hussain, A., & Nadzir, M. M. (2017). Balancing Usability and Aesthetic Elements in Universities’ Website: A Systematic Review. Malaysian Journal of Communication. Retrieved from https://ejournals.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/22625/7138
Aghazadeh, M. (2016). Explanation and design of the artistic standard for the production and evaluation of new educational media (case study: interactive digital courseware). (Master), Tarbiat Modares, Iran. Retrieved from https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/22823d6eeab7c4dc9b88034a0beb615c [In Persian]
Alasem, A. N. (2013). Evaluating the usability of Saudi Digital Library's interface. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science. https://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCECS2013/WCECS2013_pp178-181.pdf
Alsudani, F., & Casey, M. (2009). The Effect of Aesthetics on Web Credibility. Paper presented at the People and Computers XXIII Celebrating People and Technology (HCI), UK. https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2009.64
Altaboli, A., & Lin, Y. (2011a). Investigating Effects of Screen Layout Elements on Interface and Screen Design Aesthetics. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2011, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2011/659758
Altaboli, A., & Lin, Y. (2011b). Objective and Subjective Measures of Visual Aesthetics of Website Interface Design: The Two Sides of the Coin. In Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches (pp. 35-44).
Andrejevic, M. (2009). Exploiting YouTube: Contradictions of user-generated labor. In The youtube reader (Vol. 413, pp. 406-423).
Azar, A. (2001). Extension and development of Shannon& entropy method for data processing in content analysis. AlZahra University Scientific Research Quarterly Journal of Human Sciences. Retrieved from https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20120426185640-5200-168.pdf [In Persian]
Bagheri Lori, M. R. (2017). The role of technology in the sphere of life and aesthetics of the audience and contemporary artist with an emphasis on digital art. (Doctoral dissertation), Isfahan University of Arts, Isfahan, Iran. Retrieved from https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/f428a2d64238443d27bc84b540b7e810 [In Persian]
Bhandari, U., Chang, K., & Neben, T. (2019). Understanding the impact of perceived visual aesthetics on user evaluations: An emotional perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 85-93. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.07.003
Bo, Y., Yu, J., & Zhang, K. (2018). Computational aesthetics and applications. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art, 1(1), 6. doi:10.1186/s42492-018-0006-1
Bowen, A. (2019). The Visual Effect: A Literature Review of Visual Design Principles as They Apply to Academic Library Websites. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 23(3-4), 67-88. doi:10.1080/10875301.2019.1702133
Boychuk, E., & Bakaev, M. (2019). Entropy and Compression Based Analysis of Web User Interfaces. In Web Engineering (pp. 253-261).
Cader, P. (2012). An Interactive User Management System for Multilingual Documents: A case study of the Pei Jones collection. (Master), University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/6606
Cai, S., & Xu, Y. (2011). Designing Not Just for Pleasure: Effects of Web Site Aesthetics on Consumer Shopping Value. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 159-188. doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415150405
Cheatle, P., Lin, Q., Fan, Z. Z., Gevers, T., Schettini, R., & Snoek, C. (2010). Automatic image cropping for republishing. Paper presented at the Imaging and Printing in a Web 2.0 World; and Multimedia Content Access: Algorithms and Systems IV.
Chevalier, A., Maury, A.-C., & Fouquereau, N. (2013). The influence of the search complexity and the familiarity with the website on the subjective appraisal of aesthetics, mental effort and usability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(2), 117-132. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.819936
Cusker, J. (2014). SciTech News. Retrieved from https://jdc.jefferson.edu/scitechnews/vol68/iss2/1/
Demangeot, C., & Broderick, A. J. (2006). Exploring the experiential intensity of online shopping environments. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 9(4), 325-351. doi:10.1108/13522750610689078
Ebrahimi Rahmati, S. (2014). Persian fonts with an emphasis on the aesthetics of Persian calligraphy in contemporary Iranian graphics. (Master), Iran. Retrieved from https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/d00e32ff5cb21c48aac34b8a0d9a659a [In Persian]
Fong, S. M., & Yusof, U. K. (2018). The Influence of Aesthetic Design of E-Commerce Website on Intention to Purchase. Advanced Science Letters, 24(2), 1298-1302. doi:10.1166/asl.2018.10736
Gabrieli, G., Bornstein, M. H., Setoh, P., & Esposito, G. (2022). Machine learning estimation of users’ implicit and explicit aesthetic judgments of web-pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(4), 392-402. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.2023635
Geissler, G. L., Zinkhan, G. M., & Watson, R. T. (2006). The Influence of Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 69-80. doi:10.1080/00913367.2006.10639232
Gheymatgar, H. (2021). Introduction of Cognitive Science Laboratory. Retrieved from https://iseds.pgu.ac.ir/en/cognitive-sciences-lab
Guo, Y. M., & Hall, D. (2009). Website complexity: Objective versus subjective measures. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth Midwest United States Association for Information Systems Conference, Madison. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=mwais2009#:~:text=Objective%20site%20complexity%20is%20measured,two%20distinct%20yet%20related%20constructs
Hannah, J. (2023). What Is Typography, and Why Is It Important? A Beginner’s Guide. Retrieved from https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ui-design/beginners-guide-to-typography/
Hsiu-Feng, W. (2014). Picture perfect: Girls’ and boys’ preferences towards visual complexity in children’s websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 551-557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.033
Hui, X. (2015). Research on New Pattern of Contemporary Internet Application Interface Design from the Perspectives of Graphic Art and Aesthetic Thinking. Paper presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Engineering Technology, Education and Management (ISETEM), Dali, PEOPLES R CHINA. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000380290100035
Javid, M. A. J., Blackwell, T., Zimmer, R., & al-Rifaie, M. M. (2016). Correlation Between Human Aesthetic Judgement and Spatial Complexity Measure. In Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design (pp. 79-91).
Jiang, Z., Wang, W., Tan, B. C. Y., & Yu, J. (2016). The Determinants and Impacts of Aesthetics in Users’ First Interaction with Websites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1), 229-259. doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1172443
Jylhä, H., & Hamari, J. (2021). Demographic factors have little effect on aesthetic perceptions of icons: a study of mobile game icons. Internet Research, 32(7), 87-110. doi:10.1108/intr-07-2020-0368
Kusumasondjaja, S. (2019). Exploring the role of visual aesthetics and presentation modality in luxury fashion brand communication on Instagram. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(1), 15-31. doi:10.1108/jfmm-02-2019-0019
Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International journal of human-computer studies. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1071581903001642#aep-article-footnote-id1
Lazard, A. J., & King, A. J. (2019). Objective Design to Subjective Evaluations: Connecting Visual Complexity to Aesthetic and Usability Assessments of eHealth. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(1), 95-104. doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1606976
Lazard, A. J., Watkins, I., Mackert, M. S., Xie, B., Stephens, K. K., & Shalev, H. (2016). Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 23(e1), e157-161. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv174
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br J Psychol, 95(Pt 4), 489-508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811
Leibniz, G. W. (2024). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Wilhelm_Leibniz
Marmat, G. (2023). Influence of aesthetics attributes of brand Web pages on customer brand engagement. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 72(4/5), 484-505.
Mbipom, G. E. (2013). The interplay between web aesthetics and accessibility. Doctorate thesis. (Doctorate), The University of Manchester, UK. Retrieved from https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54534408/FULL_TEXT.PDF
Medina, C., Machado, T. K., Jacob, R. T. d. S., & Domiciano, C. L. C. (2019). Information Design and Infography: contributions to enhance audiologists through digital educational material. In Selected Readings of the 8th Information Design International Conference - Information Design: Memories (pp. 51-70): Blucher.
Michailidou, E., Harper, S., & Bechhofer, S. (2008). Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1456536.1456581
Miniukovich, A., & Marchese, M. (2020). Relationship Between Visual Complexity and Aesthetics of Webpages. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376602
Mohajery, F., & Mohammad Salehi, R. (2009). Evaluation of the characteristics of Rasa user interface. Journal of knowledge studies. Retrieved from. https://qje.ntb.iau.ir/article_520718.html [In Persian]
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med, 151(4), 264-269, W264. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Molarezaei, M. (2023). Designing a self-directed learning model in the University of Medical Sciences using the hybrid method Mehran Molarzaei. Transformational Human Resources. Retrieved from http://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1037848
Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689-709. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
Nake, F. (2012). Information Aesthetics: An heroic experiment. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 6(2-3), 65-75. doi:10.1080/17513472.2012.679458
Odushegun, L. (2023). Aesthetic semantics: Affect rating of atomic visual web aesthetics for use in affective user experience design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 171. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102978
Olya, M., & Rashtipour, M. (2017). Leibniz: The Birthplace of Modern Aesthetics. Journal of Philosophical Investigations. Retrieved from https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_14902_ba223c26fca147312d8a2d5554af7e3f.pdf
Oyibo, K., Adaji, I., Orji, R., & Vassileva, J. (2018). What Drives the Perceived Credibility of Mobile Websites: Classical or Expressive Aesthetics? In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction in Context (pp. 576-594).
Pandir, M., & Knight, J. (2006). Web Site Aesthetics: The Search for Preference Factors. Leonardo, 39(2), 102-102. doi:10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.102
Park, S.-e., Choi, D., & Kim, J. (2004). Critical factors for the aesthetic fidelity of web pages: empirical studies with professional web designers and users. Interacting with Computers, 16(2), 351-376. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2003.07.001
Peak, D., Gibson, M., & Prybutok, V. (2011). 3. Synergizing Positivistic and Aesthetic Approaches to Improve the Development of Interactive, Visual Systems Design. Information Design Journal, 19(2), 103-121. doi:10.1075/idj.19.2.03gib
Peng, Y. (2022). Athec. Computational Communication Research, 4(1). doi:10.5117/ccr2022.1.009.peng
Post, R., Nguyen, T., & Hekkert, P. (2017). Unity in Variety in website aesthetics: A systematic inquiry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103, 48-62. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.003
Purchase, H. C., Freeman, E., & Hamer, J. (2012). An Exploration of Visual Complexity. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (pp. 200-213).
Ramezani Nia, M., & Shokouhyar, S. (2020). Analyzing the effects of visual aesthetic of Web pages on users’ responses in online retailing using the VisAWI method. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14(4), 357-389. doi:10.1108/jrim-11-2018-0147
Redi, M., Liu, F. Z., & O'Hare, N. (2017). Bridging the Aesthetic Gap. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval.
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Group, P.-S. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev, 10(1), 39. doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
Richardson, M. A. (2008). Pysafe: An inter e: An interdisciplinar disciplinary approach to inter o interface design. (Master), California State University, San Bernardino. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4523&context=etd-project
Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 386-399. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003
Rouzbahani, R., Afhami, R., & Abdolvand, N. (2021). The Relation between the Objective Aspects and the Aesthetic Perception of Web Pages Case Study: The Website of Iranian Newspapers in the Year 2019. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 18(95), 101-114. doi:10.22034/bagh.2020.235449.4577 [In Persian]
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research: springer publishing company.
Schmidt, T., & Wolff, C. (2018). The Influence of User Interface Attributes on Aesthetics. i-com, 17(1), 41-55. doi:10.1515/icom-2018-0003
Seale, M., Hicks, A., & Nicholson, K. P. (2022). Towards a critical turn in library UX. FIMS Publications College and Research Libraries, 83(1), 6. doi:10.5860/crl.83.1.6
Seckler, M., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2015). Linking objective design factors with subjective aesthetics: An experimental study on how structure and color of websites affect the facets of users’ visual aesthetic perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 375-389. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.056
Sedaghati, S. (2018). Reading the visual characteristics of the art of minimalism on different areas of graphic design based on symbols and commercial signs. (Master), Shiraz University of Arts, Shiraz, Iran. Retrieved from https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/d206e5551802d050658b62061e3a9d7d [In Persian]
Sedghi Shamir, B. (2014). Proposing a model for investigate the effect of basic neuroscience and social psychology on business websites. (Master), Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran. Retrieved from https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/57b80984725921c92cae3574a61315a8 [In Persian]
Sheikhshoaei, F., Naghshineh, n., Alidousti, S., & Nakhoda, M. (2017). A basis for designing digital library maturity model: Meta-synthesis method application. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 32(3), 843-874. doi:10.35050/jipm010.2017.040 [In Persian]]
Strebe, R. (2015). Aesthetics on the web: effects on approach and avoidance behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(1), 4-20. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2015.1070202
Su, H.-H., Chen, T.-W., Kao, C.-C., Hsu, W. H., & Chien, S.-Y. (2012). Preference-Aware View Recommendation System for Scenic Photos Based on Bag-of-Aesthetics-Preserving Features. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 14(3), 833-843. doi:10.1109/tmm.2012.2186123
Tella, A. (2021). Interactivity, usability and aesthetic as predictors of undergraduates’ preference for university library websites. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 86(2). doi:10.7553/86-2-1905
Thielsch, M. T., & Moshagen, M. (2015). Visual Aesthetics of Websites Inventory. Retrieved from http://www.thielsch.org/download/VisAWI/VisAWI_Manual_EN.pdf
Tomitaka, M., Uchihara, S., Goto, A., & Sasaki, T. (2021). Species richness and flower color diversity determine aesthetic preferences of natural-park and urban-park visitors for plant communities. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 11. doi:10.1016/j.indic.2021.100130
Tseng, K.-T., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2014). The Correlation between Visual Complexity and User Trust in On-line Shopping: Implications for Design. In Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services (pp. 90-99).
Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K. (2010). Symmetry and aesthetics in website design: It’s a man’s business. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1831-1837. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.016
van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2009). The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(1), 79-89. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.012
Wang, H.-F., & Bowerman, J. (2014). The Impact of Visual Complexity on Children's Learning Websites in Relation to Aesthetic Preference and Learning Motivation. In Emerging Research and Trends in Interactivity and the Human-Computer Interface (pp. 395-412).
Wang, L., Gao, H., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Research on online shopping contextual cues: refining classification from text mining. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(11), 2704-2726. doi:10.1108/apjml-10-2022-0847
Wang, M., & Li, X. (2016). Effects of the aesthetic design of icons on app downloads: evidence from an android market. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 83-102. doi:10.1007/s10660-016-9245-4
Wang, X., Li, Y., Cai, Z., & Liu, H. (2021). Beauty matters: reducing bounce rate by aesthetics of experience product portal page. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(8), 1848-1870. doi:10.1108/imds-08-2020-0484
Warwick, C. (2017). Beauty is truth: Multi-sensory input and the challenge of designing aesthetically pleasing digital resources. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(suppl_2), ii135-ii150. doi:10.1093/llc/fqx036
Yakunin, A. V., & Bodrunova, S. S. (2022). Cumulative Impact of Testing Factors in Usability Tests for Human-Centered Web Design. Future Internet, 14(12). doi:10.3390/fi14120359
Yazdani, F., & Zandi, B. (2009). Application of aesthetic and technical criteria in organizing the content of distance education courses. Peyk noor, 23, 24-42. [In Persian]
Younas, A., Faisal, C. M. N., Habib, M. A., Ashraf, R., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Role of Design Attributes to Determine the Intention to Use Online Learning via Cognitive Beliefs. IEEE Access, 9, 94181-94202. doi:10.1109/access.2021.3093348
Zohrehvandi, m., & Emami Far, N. (2017). Fundamentals of IRIB Channels Websites page layout structure "by Case Study of IRIB TV1 Channel Websites. Negareh Journal, 12(41), 42-53. doi:10.22070/negareh.2017.486 [In Persian]
CAPTCHA Image