OPAC Users’ Views toward the Categorization and Terminology of The Epic of Kings Bibliographic family

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• Sholeh Arastoopoor ¹
• Rahmatollah Fattahi ²
• Mehri Parirokh ²

¹ Member of the faculty of the Regional Center for Science and Technology Information

² Professor of Library and Information Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

10.22067/riis.v1i2.8588

Abstract

Users’ view toward the bibliographic family and related works is a matter of importance yet it is not well treated among different FRBRizing studies. Knowing the users’ terminology and the information elements in a bibliographic record they consume, can be of help in implementing FRBR in OPACs. This paper aims at studying users’ views toward the bibliographic family of the Epic of Kings (Shahnameh) by Ferdowsi as a case. Through this study, based on a mixed method, 40 bibliographic cards were distributed among 30 highly specialized researchers in the field and they sorted the card out in to 11 groups. Based on the names they attributed to each group, 11 hierarchical structures were accumulated and a bibliographic tree was formed based on the users’ view towards the bibliographic family and the FRBR model.

---

References

 

Andersen, J. (2002). Materiality of Works: The Bibliographic Record as Text". Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 33 (3/4): 39 – 65.

Carlyle, A. (1996). Ordering Author and Work Records: An Evaluation of Collocation in Online Catalog Displays. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7): 538 – 554.

Carlyle, A. (1997). Fulfilling the Second Objective in the Online Catalog: Schemes for Organizing Author and Work Records in to Usable Displays. Library Resources & Technical Services,  41(2): 79 – 100.

Delsey, T. (2002). Functional analysis of the MARC 21 bibliographic and holdings formats. Washington: Library of Congress. Retrieved 2009-02-21 from http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/home.html.

Dickey, T. (2008). FRBRization of a Library Catalog: Better Collocation of Records, Leading to Enhanced Search, Retrieval, and Display. Information Technology and Libraries. March: 23 -32.

Fattahi, R. (1996). Super Records: And Approach Towards the Description of Works Appearing in Various Manifestations. Library Review, 45 (4): 19 – 29.

Fattahi, R. (2010). From Information to Knowledge: Super-Works and the Challenges in the Organization and Representation of the Bibliographic Universe. Firenze: Casalini Libri.

Gorman, M. (2004). Authority Control in the Context of Bibliographic Control in Electronic Environment. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38 (3/4): 11 – 22.

Hagler, R. (1997^a). The Bibliographic Record and Information Technology. Chicago: American Library Association.

Hagler, R. (1997^b). Access Points for Works. In International Conference on Principles and Future Developments of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October, 23 – 25. (Online) Available at: http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/intlconf1.html

Statement of International Cataloging Principles (2009). Retrieved 2011-05-25 From http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf

Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Vellucci, Sh. (1997). "Bibliographic Relationships". In International Conference on Principles and Future Developments of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October, 23 – 25. Retrieved 2008-12-28 from http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/intlconf1.html

Yee, M. (1994). What is a Work? Part 2: The Angelo-American Cataloging Codes. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19 (2): 5 – 22.

Yee, M. (1995). What is a Work? Part 4: Cataloging Theorists and a Definition Abstract.  Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 20 (2): 3 – 24.

Yee, M. (1997). What is a Work?. In International Conference on Principles and Future Developments of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October, 23 – 25. Retrieved 2008-12-28 from http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/intlconf1.html

Yee, M. (2005). FRBRization: A Method for Turning Online Public Catalogs. Information Technology and Libraries, June: 77 – 95.